Rep. Ilhan Omar’s stirred up a hornet’s nest. But, sorry Donald. Blasting AIPAC doesn’t make you anti-Semitic. And “Jexodus” is not a thing. Donald Trump can wish Jewish Democrats were fleeing into the GOP’s arms over her comments all he wants. But there is no such Exodus to the Republican Party.

In fact, Trump just wants to distract us from the real issue: That a major force behind the GOP’s Israel policy is anti-Semitic right-wing evangelical “Christians,” not AIPAC. We’ll get to that later. And never forget. A president who calls neo-Nazis “very fine people” is no friend to Israel or the Jewish people. Crying crocodile tears over the latest white terrorist attack on Muslims doesn’t make you not-racist.

Trump tweets: Donald J. Trump ‏ Verified account @realDonaldTrump Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump More Just spoke with Jacinda Ardern, the Prime Minister of New Zealand, regarding the horrific events that have taken place over the past 24 hours. I informed the Prime Minister.... ....that we stand in solidarity with New Zealand – and that any assistance the U.S.A. can give, we stand by ready to help. We love you New Zealand! 12:14 PM - 15 Mar 2019

The GOP’s president tweets condolences to New Zealand’s prime minister.

So, what do you do when a racist terrorist cites your president as a source of inspiration in their manifesto? Be afraid. Very afraid.

Tweet: Dr. Henry Tam ‏@HenryBTam 3h3 hours ago More If Islamic terrorists kill ppl in the name of their religion, their religion is to be vilified? But if white supremacists kill ppl while citing Trump as their inspiration, it has nothing to do with Trump? - Link to Guardian article "White House dismisses Trump mention in Christchurch shooter manifesto"

Tweet pointing out the hypocrisy of Donald Trump’s different handling of Islamic terrorism and white supremacist terrorism.

The GOP Doesn’t Care About Anti-Semitism: They Just Want to Weaponize It

In case you’re wondering why Republicans suddenly care about hate speech, look no further than the Motion to Recommit. MTRs have been used by the minority party to derail — or at least water down — legislation since 1909. How does it work? Indivisible’s website explains the minority party can offer an MTR “to stop or amend a bill” before the vote. The GOP uses this to sow divisions among Democrats, then sits back and watches the fun.

Their strategy? Pick an issue they think will divide Democrats, throw it into a last-minute MTR, and peel off just enough Dems to successfully water down an otherwise progressive bill with something problematic.

This is how Republicans got a racist, anti-immigrant amendment added to a gun background checks bill. So why not try sneaking a pro-Israel, anti-free speech clause into a budget bill? For a long time, Israel has been seen as a crucial U.S. ally and has enjoyed bipartisan support. The Democratic Party has especially had warm relations with Israel in the past. But as their abuses in Palestine have come to light, there’s an ever-widening divide.

Let’s also not forget. Then-House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) invited Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to Congress in 2015. This was clearly meant to send a pointed message of disrespect to President Barack Obama. And it surely contributed to Ilhan Omar’s concerns about Israel’s outsized influence on U.S. policy.

What AIPAC Wants, AIPAC Gets: Anti-Free Speech Laws Against Israel Boycotts

It all started back in December 2018. The GOP was pushing a spending bill to avoid a government shutdown. But guess what? The bill had a sneaky clause for companies and groups that support the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. This anti-BDS clause bans organizations from doing business with the U.S. government if they’re boycotting products from Israel. Florida, Texas, and 24 other states have similar laws on the books for state contracts.

Why is anti-BDS legislation so popular? Because the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) wants it. In fact, they practically wrote these laws themselves.

This in spite of the fact that this violates our First Amendment rights to free speech… And despite the fact that Republicans see corporations as “people” who therefore also have their rights to Freedom of Speech.

Meanwhile, our first Muslim congresswomen-elects Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) were pushing back on our pro-Israel stance. Tlaib, whose parents came from Palestine, very publicly refused AIPAC’s invitation to speak in Israel. And both women came out against anti-BDS laws and in support of the BDS movement.

Tweet from Zhi Zhu ‏ @ZhiZhuWeb Follow Follow @ZhiZhuWeb More Replying to @ZhiZhuWeb @ABC @jonkarl Here is a map of which US states have anti-BDS Israel Loyalty Laws (red) and which have such laws pending (blue). It is NOT antisemitism to ask why these laws place the financial well-being of Israel over US citizens' #FirstAmendment rights. #IstandWithIlhan

Tweet with map of U.S. states with anti-BDS Israel loyalty laws.

According to OpenSecrets.Org, AIPAC spent a whopping $3,518,028 on their pro-Israel lobby in 2018.

“It’s All About the Benjamins Baby 🎶”

Fast-forward to February, when the GOP began to weaponize Israel to divide Democrats on Donald Trump’s shutdown. First, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) threatened to “take action” against Omar and Tlaib. “If they do not take action, I think you’ll see action from myself,” he told reporters.

The Intercept‘s Glenn Greenwald then clapped back on Twitter with a pointed link to an article in Israel’s Haaretz.

Tweet from the Intercept's Glenn Greenwald @GGGreenwald GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy threatens punishment for @IlhanMN and @RashidaTlaib over their criticisms of Israel. It's stunning how much time US political leaders spend defending a foreign nation even if it means attacking free speech rights of Americans.

Tweet from the Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald on Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s threats against Reps Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.

With a pop-culture reference that went right over most members of Congress’ heads — even with the musical notes — Ilhan Omar replied, “It’s all about the Benjamins, baby 🎶”

Ilhan Omar tweet: "It's all about the Benjamins, baby 🎶"

Ilhan Omar tweet: “It’s all about the Benjamins, baby 🎶”

And no, Omar’s not talking about some Jewish guy named Benjamin. The term, “Benjamins,” refers to Ben Franklin’s portrait on $100 bills. Nor is she conjuring up some tired old trope about evil Jews spending money to gain influence. She was specifically talking about the pro-Israel lobby. Among which AIPAC is the most well-known.

Tweet: Batya Ungar Sargon @bungarsargon: Would love to know who @IlhanMN thinks is paying American politicians to be pro-Israel, though I think I can guess. Bad form, Congresswoman. That's the second anti-Semitic trope you've tweeted.

When asked what she meant, Ilhan Omar tweets back, “AIPAC!”

And now, she’s under fire from both Democrats and Republicans howling about her alleged “anti-Semitism.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has deftly managed to condemn anti-Semitism without condemning Ilhan Omar. Also, as the controversy came to a boil, the House passed a resolution that condemns all forms of hate.  Plus, she’s apologized. Yet, the GOP’s still got Democrats screaming at each other instead of at GOP lawmakers and Donald Trump.

I’ve got news for you. Big money in politics is not a “Jewish” thing. And objecting to its outsized influence does not make you a hater.

Meanwhile, the GOP gets a convenient excuse to hate on a Muslim congresswoman with impunity… While keeping brown children in cages, egging on terrorist attacks by white supremacists, and making a full-on assault against the hard-won rights of women, people of color, LGBTQ people, the disabled and others in disadvantaged groups. If the GOP really cared about hate speech, maybe they’ll rescind that Muslim ban.

Conflating Israel and Jewish People Is, In Itself, Anti-Semitic

It’s bad enough that the GOP seeks to weaponize the Democrats’ vision of tolerance and inclusion. It’s bad enough that the GOP seeks to weaponize the place Israel holds in so many Jewish people’s hearts.

But the assumption that all Jewish people blindly support Israel is, in itself, anti-Semitic. We’ve long claimed Catholics, Jews, and Muslim can never be full Americans because they’re more loyal to a foreign power. Within many of our living memories, people claimed John F. Kennedy couldn’t serve our country because he was Catholic. But the Vatican, Jerusalem, and Mecca are centers of our religions, not our civic identities.

For most Jewish people, Israel represents freedom from Pharoah’s bondage and refuge from the Holocaust. But loving Israel doesn’t mean loving apartheid in Gaza and the West Bank. So how do Jewish people feel about Israel? As shown in the tweet below, It’s complicated.

Tweet from Ben about Israel: 1) I’m Jewish 2) I’m a millennial 3) I support the existance of the state of Israel 4) I think that the Israeli-boycott movement is bad 5) I support a two-state solution 6) I think Netanyahu is a prat 7) I hope Netanyahu gets arrested and is convicted on criminal charges.

Tweet from a Jewish Millennial who supports the state of Israel and is against the BDS movement, but who believes Netanyahu should be arrested and charged.

Some fully support Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, while others love Israel but not Israel’s policies. Meanwhile, many liberal Jewish groups — along with an anti-Zionist Orthodox sect — stand with Ilhan Omar.

Tweet from Jewish Voice for Peace: @jvplive Follow Follow @jvplive More Netanyahu always makes it so easy to support the boycott on Israel. He’ll be speaking at the AIPAC conference in late March, so if you value freedom, justice and equality it’s a no-brainer to #SkipAIPAC this year and every year until Palestine is free. http://bit.ly/2J58Got

Anti-AIPAC and anti-Netanyahu tweet from Jewish Voice for Peace.

Right-Wing “Christian” Evangelicals Are Driving the GOP’s Israel Policies, Not AIPAC

Yes. You read that right. The GOP’s “pro-Israel” policies are being driven by right-wing “Christian” evangelicals, not AIPAC. And anti-Semitic right-wing “Christian” evangelicals to boot. But, of course, Republicans don’t want us to know this.

As pro-AIPAC journalist Jane Eisner writes in the Forward, “Trump Has Handed the Israel Lobby to Evangelicals. That’s Terrifying.” She goes on to explain that with V.P. Mike Pence in the West Wing, Christians United for Israel (CUFI)’s influence now dwarfs AIPAC’s.

Some may welcome the way that the Trump administration has tilted the scales toward Israel and its current hard-line government. But there is real reason to worry when foreign policy is in the grip of fundamentalist ideology, when political issues become biblical ones.

So why do these right-wing Christians love the Jewish people so much? They don’t. But Israel and its Jewish citizens have a role to play in the long-awaited Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

Since [Richard] Land and others like him believe that Jesus Christ will only return as the Messiah when Jews reside in Canaan and rule over Jerusalem, the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 is considered a fulfillment of one aspect of biblical prophecy. Trump’s announcement on Jerusalem is another one.

Richard Land, president of the Southern Evangelical Seminary in Charlotte, N.C. even told Eisner:

“The Jews being back in the land and being in control of the land is part of the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. If we were, as a country, to thwart the Jewish people and their desires and their God-given right to occupy that land, then God would not bless us as a people.”

Jane Eisner adds Christians and Jews play a “starring role” in the drama Christian fundamentalists believe will unfold. But there’s no place for Muslims in all of this, they’re just in the way. There’s also good reason for many of Israel’s Jewish supporters to feel uneasy about this unholy alliance. As Vox points out, the end-times end with Jewish people and other non-believers being cast into burning lakes of fire. As Elizabeth Oldmixon, a Poli Sci professor at the University of North Texas, explains to Vox‘s Sean Illing:

“These are the folks who believe that there will be a millennium in the future, a golden age, where Christ reigns on Earth, [and] they believe that before Christ will return, there will be a tribulation where Christ defeats evil. There will be natural disasters and wars, and perhaps an Antichrist, as the book of Revelations notes. Then at the end of that period, the people of the Mosaic covenant, including the Jews, will convert. Then after their conversion, the great millennium starts.”

Yes, you read that right. “After their [the Jews’] conversions, the Great Millennium starts.” So what becomes of those who don’t convert, Illing asks. Oldmixon’s answer:

Well, according to the evangelicals who believe this, they’ll end up with the rest of the unsaved, which means they’ll be wiped out and sent to hell.

Wow. You can’t get much more anti-Semitic than that.

The Song That Sparked A Million Tweets

In case you’ve never heard it… Here’s the Artist-Formerly-Known-As-Puff-Daddy’s 1990’s hit, “It’s All About the Benjamins.”

Featured image: CC-By-SA 2.0 Lorrie Shaull via Flickr.