With Hillary Clinton’s huge early voting numbers and surge in the polls, how did Donald Trump win? He didn’t, but in a rigged election, that doesn’t matter.
Donald Trump warned about a rigged election all through 2016. But he was wrong about who was doing the rigging. Remember: These right-wingers often reveal the evil things they do by assuming the rest of us do them too.
All this talk about exit polls, voter suppression, Russian hackers, and gerrymandering sounds like the stuff of deranged conspiracy theories. Yet these three experts — investigative journalist Greg Palast, U.C. Berkeley law professor Jonathan Simon, and NSA Director Admiral Michael Rogers — agree this was a rigged election. Furthermore, Rachel Maddow warned us about this back in 2013.
Rigged Election: The GOP purged voter rolls in Crosscheck states.
Last Friday, Greg Palast declared “the election was stolen” on his blog. GOP-run states used a system called Crosscheck to purge 1.1 million mostly minority voters from the rolls…And then Donald Trump managed to win in swing states that seemed likely to go to Hillary Clinton.
Voter Fraud Google this:
"Greg Palast – Crosscheck" pic.twitter.com/9zpFzYNdbb
— Joe Anybody (@iamjoeanybody) January 26, 2017
In his August report for Rolling Stone, Palast explained the role Crosscheck played in this rigged election. The system was supposed to keep voter information up-to-date. Instead, GOP officials abused it to flag people they claim may have registered to vote twice.
The result? People wound up on a long purge list just for having the same or similar names.
— whatishappening (@Whahappenedhere) November 13, 2016
Greg Palast got hold of just part of the Crosscheck list (which still had that 1.1 million names on it). He then brought in a database analyst who found the list “disproportionately threatens” Democratic minority voters in swing states.
And here’s the perfect cherry to top off this fustercluck sundae: The man who created Crosscheck is Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, one of Mein Trumpf’s advisers!
— Greg Palast (@Greg_Palast) September 12, 2016
The exit poll numbers don’t add up either.
Soon after the alleged victory of Donald Trump, Theodore de Macedo Soares posted a stunning chart on his electoral integrity blog, TDMS|Research. After downloading, crunching, and comparing CNN’s exit poll data with the final vote counts, he found the numbers make no sense.
Exit polls are usually highly reliable…And the ones from North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Florida clearly show Hillary Clinton should have won.
— Greg Palast (@Greg_Palast) November 15, 2016
Macedo Soares may have more smarts than formal credentials. But someone else agrees the numbers don’t add up…And he just happens to be a published author and the Associate Dean of the Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program at the Boalt Hall School of Law at U.C. Berkeley.
Jonathan Simon talked with Steve Rosenfeld from Alternet and gave him quite an earful.
Simon’s been tracking exit polls for the past 15 years and said he’s seen a pronounced “red shift” since 2004. Year after year, exit polls favor the more left (blue) candidate. Then the vote counts abruptly shift right and the more conservative candidate wins.
While Simon doesn’t go so far as to say this latest rigged election was stolen by the GOP, he believes something’s seriously wrong with these numbers. On the one hand, too many people care more about the Kardashians than they do about voting and politics. On the other hand, the system is so entrenched that no one who’s in a position to change things wants to rock the boat.
You will rarely meet a politician or a journalist with a seat at or anywhere near the adult table who wants to rock this boat, who wants to pull the cover off of this thing, who wants to restore public sovereignty.
Even if the votes haven’t been tampered with, our computerized voting systems, lack of transparency, and lack of paper ballots foster a level of distrust that likely effects voter turnout. When there’s no way to verify whether votes get counted properly — and one political party keeps undermining our faith in government — then people start believing what they want to believe.
Continues on the next page.